Flock

Section 127: Failure to Pay a Declared Dividend

By Flock Research · Filings research desk

Section 127 failure to pay dividend is the enforcement half of the Companies Act, 2013's dividend machinery. Section 123 governs where a dividend may come from. Section 127 governs what happens once it has been declared and the money does not reach the shareholder. The clock is thirty days from declaration, the company pays interest at eighteen per cent a year, and a director who is knowingly a party to the default is personally exposed.

Definition

Section 127

of the Companies Act, 2013 applies where a declared dividend is not paid, or the warrant for it is not posted, within thirty days of the declaration to a shareholder entitled to it. The company is liable to simple interest at eighteen per cent per annum for the period of default, and a director knowingly a party to it faces imprisonment and a daily fine. Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 127.

What triggers section 127 failure to pay dividend liability?

The section has no sub-sections. It runs as one sentence, and it needs three facts to be true at once:

  1. a dividend has been declared by the company
  2. it has not been paid, or the warrant in respect of it has not been posted, within thirty days from the date of declaration
  3. the person it has not reached is a shareholder entitled to the payment of that dividend

Posting the warrant is enough. The section is drafted around dispatch rather than receipt: its second limb asks whether the warrant has been posted within the thirty days, not whether it has arrived.

18% per annum

The simple interest the company is liable to pay under section 127 during the period for which its failure to pay a declared dividend continues

Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 127

The section states the company's liability to that interest without naming the payee, so the text itself does not say to whom the interest runs.

What a director carries

A director of the company is punishable "if he is knowingly a party to the default", in the section's own words. Two things follow from that phrasing. The liability is not automatic on every member of the Board, and knowledge is part of the offence rather than a defence to it.

Where a director is knowingly a party, section 127 sets a custodial limb and a monetary limb for them, and a third consequence that falls on the company itself:

LimbWhat section 127 provides
ImprisonmentMay extend to two years
FineNot less than one thousand rupees for every day during which the default continues
The company's liabilitySimple interest at eighteen per cent per annum for the period of the default

The daily fine has a floor and no ceiling stated in the section. A default that runs for months compounds in a way a flat figure would not.

The five cases where no offence is committed

The proviso to section 127 lists five situations in which no offence under the section is deemed to have been committed. They are the section's whole defensive surface:

  • (a) where the dividend could not be paid by reason of the operation of any law
  • (b) where a shareholder has given directions to the company regarding payment, those directions cannot be complied with, and that has been communicated to them
  • (c) where there is a dispute regarding the right to receive the dividend
  • (d) where the dividend has been lawfully adjusted by the company against any sum due to it from the shareholder
  • (e) where, for any other reason, the failure to pay or to post the warrant was not due to any default on the part of the company

Clause (b) has a communication requirement built into it. The directions must be uncompliable and the company must have communicated that fact to the shareholder. Doing the first without the second leaves the company outside the proviso.

Clause (e) is the residual limb, and it is the one that carries most real cases: a failure that is not the company's default is not an offence, however long it lasts.

How section 127 sits with sections 123 and 124

The three sections run on one timeline from the date of declaration.

DaySectionWhat must happen
Within 5 days123(4)The dividend amount, including interim dividend, is deposited in a scheduled bank in a separate account
Within 30 days127The dividend is paid or the warrant is posted, or the section 127 consequences begin
Within 7 days after day 30124(1)Whatever remains unpaid or unclaimed is transferred to the Unpaid Dividend Account

Section 127 and section 124 do not overlap in the way people expect. Section 124 is where the money goes when the shareholder does not claim it. Section 127 is what the company and its directors face when the money did not go out at all. A dividend can be lawfully sitting in an Unpaid Dividend Account and the company still be clean under section 127, because the failure was the shareholder's non-claim rather than the company's non-payment.

Flock reports the filings themselves, each stamped with its date and linked back to the exchange or regulator that published it. What any of it means for you is your call to make.

Frequently asked questions

What is section 127 of the Companies Act, 2013?

The provision that applies where a declared dividend is not paid, or the warrant for it is not posted, within thirty days from the date of declaration to a shareholder entitled to payment. The company is liable to simple interest, and a director knowingly a party to the default faces imprisonment and a daily fine. Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 127.

What interest does a company pay for a delayed dividend?

Simple interest at the rate of eighteen per cent per annum, running during the period for which the default continues. Section 127 states the company's liability to that interest without naming the person to whom it runs, so the section itself does not identify the payee. Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 127.

When is no offence committed under section 127?

In five cases listed in the proviso: where the dividend could not be paid by reason of the operation of any law, where a shareholder's directions cannot be complied with and that has been communicated, where there is a dispute about the right to receive it, where it was lawfully adjusted against a sum due, or where the failure was not the company's default. Source: Companies Act, 2013, proviso to section 127.

Is every director liable under section 127?

No. A director is punishable only if they are knowingly a party to the default. Where that is established, the punishment is imprisonment which may extend to two years and a fine of not less than one thousand rupees for every day during which the default continues. Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 127.

Flock tracks these filings, sourced, dated, and linked back to the original. See what smart-money entities disclosed, without the guesswork about what it means.

Disclosures shown are public regulatory filings. Data may be delayed or incomplete. Smart-money entities may no longer hold positions shown. Not investment advice.

The Smart Money Digest

A free weekly email of notable disclosure activity — every line with its filing date and source link. No advice, just filings. Unsubscribe anytime.